Application of transvaginal external fascia trachelectomy in the treatment of CIN and micro-invasive cervical cancer / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the feasibility and safety of transvaginal external fascia trachelectomy to conservatively treat patients with stage Ia1 squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SCC) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III, who are not suitable to take cold knife conization (CKC).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From July 2002 to September 2010, those patients who had a strong desire to preserve the uterus or fertility but also are confronted with following situations received transvaginal external fascia trachelectomy: CIN III with large area lesion (colposcopically observed lesion area was larger than 3/4 of the cervix), or patients with CIN II-III suffered recurrence or had persistent lesion or positive margin after CKC or LEEP, or patients with CIN II-III upgraded into stage Ia1 SCC through LEEP and pathological confirmation (except for those with lymphovascular space invasion), or CIN III patients complicated with upper vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN). Their clinical information and data were reviewed and analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among the 79 cases, who underwent transvaginal external fascia trachelectomy, six were stage Ia1 SCC, 61 were CIN III with a large area lesion (23 cases had glandular involvement), three were CIN III complicated with VAIN, six were CIN III with persistent lesion after LEEP, two were CIN III with positive margins after LEEP, and one case had recurrence after conization. The median age of these patients was 33 years old, ranging from 23 to 40 years old. The mean operation time was 39 min (rang 20-60 min), the average amount of bleeding was 40 ml (rang 1-300 ml) and the mean hospital stay was 10 d ( rang 6-17 d). The CIN III patients complicated with VAIN received this surgery with resection of the adjacent vaginal mucosa more than 2 cm in 3.8% (3/79). The median follow-up time was 49 months (8-85 months) and none of these patients had ureteral injury or large amount of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding or post-operative recurrence. No patient complained any effect on their sexual life. Among the five patients with reproductive desire, one was at her 22 w gestation after one induced abortion and one spontaneous abortion, four patients experienced term birth in which three were cesarean section and one was natural labour.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Transvaginal external fascia trachelectomy is a safe and effective conservative treatment for stage Ia1 SCC, CIN III with large area lesion, CIN III complicated with VAIN and CIN II-III suffering recurrence, persistent lesion or positive margins after CKC and others that are not suitable to take CKC.</p>

Study on the value assessment of various screening programs regarding cervical cancer screening strategy in the rural areas of China / 中华流行病学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the application value and feasibility of various cervical screening methods and to explore a rapid and efficient cervical cancer screening program for the women in the rural areas of China.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We sequentially conducted human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test by hybrid capture-2 (hc2) with cervical cells, liquid-based thinprep cytology test (TCT), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), visual inspection with iodine (VILI), colposcopy respectively for the 2499 married women between 30 and 49 years from Xiushui county of Jiangxi province. All the detection methods were performed independently under double-blind design. Women who were diagnosed positive for having any VIA,VILI and colposcopy inspection or for those women who were diagnosed negative for VIA, VILI and colposcopy but with positive result of HPV or TCT test underwent cervical biopsy directly and endocervical curettage (ECC)when necessary. We performed cervical biopsy endocervical curettage within two weeks to observe the sensitive (SE), specificity (SP), negative predict value (NPV) and positive predict value (PPV) of these detection methods when used alone or combined each other, including HPV test, TCT inspection, VIA, VILI, and colposcopy, the pathological diagnosises of cervical tissue were confirmed by IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) while the cytological findings were underegone through the updated program of TBS (The Bethesda System) in 2001.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 2499 women underwent the screening and found 443 women who were diagnosed as HPV positive, 337 women with abnormal cervical cytology and 27 women with ASC-H, 157 cases with ASCUS; 103 cases with HSIL, 49 cases with LSIL and 1 cervical cancer. According to the pathological findings. There were 181 women diagnosed as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cervical cancer, including 81 cases with CIN1 37 cases with CIN2,60 case cervical cancer. The sensitivity rates of HPV, TCT, HPV+ TCT, VIA, VILI, VIA+VILI and colposcopy were 96.67%, 89.47%, 97.98%, 56.57%, 36.36%, 63.64% and 39.39%, and the specificity rates were 85.00%, 96.91%, 86.97%, 94.60%, 96.23%, 92.97% and 98.14% respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>HPV + TCT seemed to be more sensitive than other screening methods in the cervical cancer screening program.</p>

The usefulness of p16INK4a in cytological screening of cervical carcinoma / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the value of p16INK4a immuncytochemical examination in cytological screening of cervical carcinoma and precancerous lesions.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>p16JNK4a immuncytochemical detection was performed on 220 specimens remaining from liquid-based cytology, followed up by biopsy histology , and compared with the results of high-risk human papillomavirus ( HR - HPV ) DNA tests . Results In patients with cytological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma( SCC) , high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) , low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) , atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) , and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) , the positive rates of p16INK4a were 100.0% (7/7), 92. 2% (107/116) , 24. 3% (17/70) , 100. 0% (14/14) and 36.4% (4/ 11) , respectively. In 111 of the 150 p6INK4a positive cases, we found 97 (87.4% ) cases which had biopsy diagnosises of > or =CIN2, but none in 18 of 70 p16INK4a negative cases was. The difference in the positive rates for p16INK4a between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and > or =CIN2 lesions had statistical significance (P < 0. 01) , whereas for HR-HPV DNA test it was not.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>p16LNK4a is over-expressed in a HSIL, and it may be useful in cytological screening of high risk patients.</p>